Naslov (ara)

Tasawwuratu l-matnwa š-šarh ila hada l-maqam

Doprinosi

ibn Ibrahim, Ahmad

Opis (eng)

This attitude toward Greek logic is epitomized in a famous debate reported to have taken place in Baghdad in 932 between the grammarian Abu Sa'id al-Sirafi and Abu BishrMatta, a Syriac Christian who translated some of Aristotle's works into Arabic and is purported to have been one of al-Farabi'steachers. The extant account of the debate is heavily biased towards al-Sirafi, who attacks logical formalism and denies the ability of logic to act as a measure of reasoning over and above the innate capacities of the intellect itself. Hisprincipal claims are that philosophical logic is nothing but Greek grammar warmed over, that it is inextricably tied to the idiom of the Greek language and that it has nothing to offer speakers of another language such as Arabic. Year of publishing: 1829.

Opis (srp)

Suprotstavljeni stav prema grčkoj logici je sažet u čuvenoj raspravi za koju se veli da se odigrala u Bagdadu 932. godine izmedu gramatičara Abu Saida As-Sirafija i Abu Bišr Mate, sirijačkog hrišćanina, koji je na arapski preveo nekoliko Aristotelovih dela i za kojeg se smatra da je bio jedan od Al-Farabijevih učitelja. Opsežan opis rasprave je bio prilično pristrasan u korist As-Sirafija koji napada logički formalizam i odbacuje sposobnost logike da se vlada kao mera razmišljanja iznad unutrašnjih kapaciteta samog intelekta. Njegove osnovne tvrdnje glase da je filozofska logika tek podgrejana grčka gramatika, da je neraskidivo povezana sa izrazom grčkog jezika i da nema da ponudi ništa govornicima drugih jezika, kao što je arapski. Godina izdavanja: 1829.

Jezik

arapski

Datum

2012-03-30T07:54:40.487Z

Licenca

Ovo delo je licencirano pod uslovima licence
Creative Commons CC BY 2.0 AT - Creative Commons Autorstvo 2.0 Austria License.

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/at/legalcode